contractless/blockchain
2
1
Fork 0
Code Issues 1 Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Update Proof of Time

contractless 2024-10-23 20:02:36 +00:00
parent 99873d7e51
commit 83e144b262
1 changed files with 0 additions and 7 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

7
Proof-of-Time.md

@ -19,7 +19,6 @@ GPUs (Graphics Processing Units) became the preferred hardware for PoW mining du
As difficulty levels in blockchain networks like Bitcoin increased, the computational power provided by CPUs quickly became insufficient for effective mining. GPUs, with their superior parallel processing capabilities, offered a significant performance boost, enabling miners to generate more hashes in a shorter period and thus increasing their likelihood of discovering a valid block. However, as the blockchain ecosystem evolved, specialized hardware such as ASICs (Application-Specific Integrated Circuits) eventually outpaced GPUs, leading to the centralization of mining power in PoW networks.
### Proof of Work (RandomX)
RandomX is a PoW concept that was created by Monero. It is specifically designed to be CPU-friendly and resistant to the dominance of specialized mining hardware like GPUs and ASICs. RandomX was introduced to preserve decentralization by making mining feasible on consumer-grade CPUs while limiting the effectiveness of GPUs and ASICs. This approach contrasts with traditional PoW algorithms.
@ -32,7 +31,6 @@ In contrast, RandomX is deliberately designed to take advantage of the sequentia
RandomX has an inverse effect compared to traditional PoW algorithms. While traditional PoW leads to mining centralization around GPUs and ASIC hardware, RandomX shifts the focus to CPUs and memory, making CPU mining more efficient. However, like other PoW algorithms, it still favors one type of hardware—CPUs—over GPUs and ASICs. To date, no PoW algorithm has been able to balance mining equally across all hardware types, as each algorithm inevitably favors either CPUs or specialized hardware like GPUs and ASICs.
### Proof of Stake
Proof of Stake (PoS) differs fundamentally from Proof of Work (PoW) in how network consensus is achieved. In PoS, validators are selected to propose and validate new blocks based on the amount of cryptocurrency they "stake,". This means they lock up a certain number of tokens as collateral. A key challenge in PoS systems arises at the very beginning, as there are no pre-existing tokens to stake when the blockchain launches. Early PoS networks often use a form of "pre-mining" or a genesis distribution where tokens created and distributed to participants, such as developers, marketers, early adopters, or via an Initial Coin Offering (ICO). These early stakeholders then provide the necessary security for the network by staking their tokens and becoming validators. For this reason, many considered PoS to be Centralized from its creation.
@ -41,7 +39,6 @@ Once staking begins, PoS systems rely on a random selection process to determine
The role of VRFs in PoS is critical for maintaining trust in the fairness of the system. Unlike PoW, where the process of block creation is tied to computational power, PoS leverages the economic value staked by participants. By using VRFs, PoS systems avoid the risk of centralization that comes from validators with larger stakes consistently controlling the network. The randomness introduced by VRFs prevents validators from being able to predict or manipulate when they will be selected, ensuring a more decentralized and equitable distribution of block rewards across the network.
### Proof of Authority
Proof of Authority (PoA) is a type of proofing that is very different from both PoW and PoS. It relies on a limited number of pre-approved validators to maintain the integrity of a blockchain. In PoA, these "authorities" are known entities that are trusted to validate transactions and create new blocks. This trust is established through reputation and identity verification, ensuring that the validators are accountable for their actions. The centralized nature of PoA makes it particularly well-suited for private blockchains where stakeholders often require a higher level of trust and oversight compared to public networks.
@ -52,7 +49,6 @@ However, the centralization inherent in Proof of Authority presents significant
Equally whereas PoA can achieve high levels of efficiency, it sacrifices transparency and openness of decentralized models. In blockchains using PoW or PoS, anyone can participate in the consensus process and validate transactions. In contrast, PoA restricts participation to a limited group which creates a system where decision-making power is concentrated among a few entities. This centralization can hinder innovation and limit the system's ability to adapt to new challenges or threats, making it less resilient in the face of changing conditions.
### Proof of Capacity
Proof of Capacity (PoC), originally developed by Burst Coin, represents a unique approach to blockchain consensus. In PoC, miners utilize available hard drive space instead of computational power to create a "grid of plots." These plots store precomputed data that enables miners to efficiently produce blocks when their particular plot is selected for a given round of mining. This method is designed to be more energy-efficient compared to traditional Proof of Work (PoW), where miners expend significant computational resources to solve complex cryptographic puzzles. By shifting the focus from processing power to storage capacity, PoC aims to democratize mining and reduce the environmental impact often associated with blockchain technology.
@ -61,7 +57,6 @@ Despite its innovative approach, Proof of Capacity is not without drawbacks. One
Additionally, the reliance on large storage capacities leads to barriers for new entrants to the mining space. While PoC was intended to lower the entry threshold compared to PoW, the escalating need for extensive storage inadvertently created an environment where only those with significant financial backing could compete effectively. This situation diminished the original goal of decentralization and inclusivity that PoC sought to achieve. In fact, as was found by burst coin, this created a vast amount of collusion that harmed the network.
### Proof of History
Proof of History (PoH) is a consensus mechanism designed to enhance the efficiency and scalability of blockchain networks. Developed primarily by the Solana blockchain, PoH serves as a cryptographic clock that allows nodes to verify the order and passage of events in a decentralized network. Unlike traditional consensus mechanisms that require extensive communication and validation among nodes to establish the order of transactions, PoH creates a historical record that timestamps events and ensures they occur in a specific sequence. This is accomplished by generating a continuous hash of previous entries.
@ -70,7 +65,6 @@ However, despite its innovative approach, Proof of History has notable drawbacks
Additionally, the complexity of the PoH mechanism can pose challenges for new participants in the network. As a relatively novel consensus approach, it requires a steep learning curve for developers and users to fully understand and implement effectively. Further, the implementation of PoH in a decentralized context requires a robust infrastructure to maintain timestamps which leads to a requirement of high performance hardware.
### Hybrid Proofing
While numerous consensus algorithms exist, many of them represent hybrid approaches designed to address specific challenges within blockchain networks. Each algorithm offers its own unique advantages and disadvantages, often reflecting the trade-offs necessary to achieve desired outcomes. However, a common set of issues tends to emerge across these systems. Frequently, we see a centralization of mining power, a high cost of entry for participants, or a combination of both, leading to an uneven playing field within the network.
@ -79,7 +73,6 @@ To date, no consensus algorithm has successfully established a framework that en
In cases where the initial cost of entry was substantial, the resulting ecosystem can become insular, reinforcing the advantage of established players and creating a cycle that perpetuates inequality. Consequently, while advancements in consensus mechanisms continue to evolve, the challenge remains to develop a system that that is truly democratic in design treating everyone absolutely equally even as it expands.
### Proof of Time
Proof of Time (PoT) is an innovative consensus algorithm developed specifically for the Contractless blockchain, designed to address the challenges associated with existing consensus mechanisms. By incorporating elements from various algorithms while considering their shortcomings, PoT establishes a fair framework for all participants, regardless of the hardware they utilize or the financial resources at their disposal. This inclusivity ensures that whether participants employ CPUs, GPUs, or ASICs, no single entity holds an unfair advantage, thereby keeping the cost of entry low and preventing centralization as the network evolves.